Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
IELTS Writing Task 2 (Essay): Hints and Sample Answers Let me try my essay.
| Actions |
Academic Writing Task 2 TopicsHints for Recent Questions
Some people think that all lawbreakers should be taken to prison. In contrast, others believe there are better alternatives, for example, doing work in the community. Some think paying taxes is a big enough contribution to society, while others believe people have more responsibilities as community members than only paying taxes. Most countries improve their living standards through economic development, but some social values are lost. Do the advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? Nowadays, celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than their achievements, which has set a bad example for young people. Do you agree or disagree?| IELTS Academic Essay Answers - #7019 |
Question:
Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Answer Hints:
Agree and disagree questions. You can choose either side as your view to answer, but "disagree" is relatively easy to write.
Agree and disagree questions. You can choose either side as your view to answer, but "disagree" is relatively easy to write.
Reasons to agree
- If police officers don't have guns, criminals may not need guns against police, so the violence level may down.
- Some violent cases are due to police overuse their guns; if don't have guns, police will involve with much less violent cases.
Reasons to disagree
- We cannot ensure criminals don't carry guns, why do we restrict police's guns
- If police cannot protect themselves, no one will take the risk to be a policeman.
- No strong police officers, citizens have to face more criminals; it's unfair for kids, women, and other weaknesses.
Answer 1
In recent years the theme of whether or not police should be armed with guns has been highly debated. While some people believe that carrying a weapon could act as a stimulus to ignite further violence, I would agree with those who argue that the police could not defend themselves and us with them without the weapons ...
By elena, 2021-03-29 View full answer - Revised by tutor
Total words: 324
Band: 7
The below version has fixed some obvious lexical and grammatical defects. The band is by the revised version, but comments are based on the original version.Task Response:
-All parts of the prompt are addressed, and a clear position is presented throughout the response.
Coherence and Cohesion:
-Ideas are generally arranged coherently, and there is a clear overall progression, although the 'weapons market' is off the topic a little.
Lexical Resources:
-The range of vocabulary is quite wide and shows awareness of collocation, but there are some errors to block a higher band.
Grammar Range and Accuracy:
-There is a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, with a fair degree of accuracy.
Answer 2
Many believe that carrying a gun by law enforcement will increase the amount of violence on the street. Although there is some truth in this argument, in my perspective, armed police are the best deterrent factor of any violent actions and crimes.
Those who argue that armed police stimulate violence on the street ...
Those who argue that armed police stimulate violence on the street ...
By Farid, 2021-04-07 View full answer - Revised by tutor
Total words: 334
Band: 6.5
The below version has fixed some obvious lexical and grammatical defects. The band is by the revised version, but comments are based on the original version.Task Response:
-Ideas relating to each sector mentioned in the prompt are presented, but there is not much development of some. "dictatorship" is off the topic a little.
Coherence and Cohesion:
-Ideas are generally arranged coherently, and there is a clear overall progression.
Lexical Resources:
-The range of vocabulary is sufficient to allow some flexibility and precision, and it shows an awareness of styles and collocation, although there are a few errors.
Grammar Range and Accuracy:
-Use a variety of complex structures, but the writing lacks grammatical control, hss grammatical errors.
Answer 3
A few people suppose that if cops carry guns, it can promote cruelty at a higher level, maybe by threatening criminals, pointing their guns out in every small mistake. However, in my opinion, carrying a gun is to stay alert and safe as their job is to visit crime scenes and catch the culprit. Therefore, I disagree that ...
By yoursistried , 2021-03-25 View full answer - Revised by tutor
Total words: 282
Band: 6
The below version has fixed some obvious lexical and grammatical defects. The band is by the revised version, but comments are based on the original version.Task Response:
-Main ideas are relevant, but some would benefit from further development.
Coherence and Cohesion:
-The organization is logical, and there is a clear central topic to each paragraph, but some paragraphs are rather short, due to a lack of development of ideas.
Lexical Resources:
-Lexis is mainly appropriate for the task, though there are some errors in word choice and spelling.
Grammar Range and Accuracy:
-In original version, grammatical errors are frequent, such as nouns (singular, plural).
- Help Link1, Help Link2
Answer 4
It is an indisputable fact that some people in the U.S carry firearms for safety purposes. Some individuals admit that police officers carrying pistols are encouraging people to more violence. This essay will explain why carrying a firearm is considered an act of violence and how ammunitions are just a safe thing for a ...
By Jagga, 2021-03-22 View full answer - Revised by tutor
Total words: 281
Band: 5.5
The below version has fixed some obvious lexical and grammatical defects. The band is by the revised version, but comments are based on the original version.Task Response:
-The ideas presented are not always developed and or relevant, don't express a clear position in the whole essay.
Coherence and Cohesion:
-The organization is evident and cohesive devices are used, though rather mechanically.Lexical Resources:
-The lexical resource is limited, but just about adequate for the task, try to enhance IELTS vocabulary.
- Help Link
Grammar Range and Accuracy:
-There are attempts to produce complex sentence forms, but there is a lack of grammatical control, which can cause some difficulty for the reader.
Answer 5
People have shown divergent views about the gun ownership of police. Some individuals reckon that the policeman's carrying weapon creates massive violence in the community, whilst others believe that corps should be equipped with guns to protect citizens. I fully see eye to eye with the people who favor that officers ...
By Simran, 2021-03-23 View full answer - Revised by tutor
Total words: 288
Band: 5.5
The below version has fixed some obvious lexical and grammatical defects. The band is by the revised version, but comments are based on the original version.Task Response:
-The logic and reasoning look good, but some sentences seem wordy and not in the style that academic writing should be in.
Coherence and Cohesion:
-The organization is evident, with some simple cohesive devices, but sometimes used inaccurately.
Lexical Resources:
-Some errors occur in word choice, word formation, and spelling.
Grammar Range and Accuracy:
-There is a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, and although errors occur, they rarely reduce communication.