GRE Verbal Reasoning Questions

Reading Comprehension Questions (Set 7)

 Select Exercise Lists
Select Exercise Set:
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 
Questions 1 to 3 below are based on this passage:

Questions 4 to 6 below are based on this passage:

Answer this question based on the information in the paragraph below.

Answer this question based on the information in the paragraph below.

A study based on a year-long analysis of data from an extensive mobile phone network has produced interesting information that might be of use to epidemiologists and social scientists. The data, according to the researchers, might shed light, for example, on how diseases and information (or rumors) are transmitted through social networks.

Researchers ranked the link between a pair of phone users on the basis of the total time spent talking to each other. ‘Strong’ links exist between members of a close social group. ‘Weak’ links tend to be more long range and join individuals from different social groups.

The researchers observed a dramatically different effect when they removed links in the network in rank order, depending on whether they removed links starting with the strongest or with the weakest. To their surprise, removing the strong links first had little effect on the overall structure of the network. But removing weak links first split the network into a series of unconnected islands, with individual users linked to a small collection of other phone users.

Thus the researchers have hypothesized that the weak links (the more tenuous connections between individuals from different social groups) might be very important in maintaining wider social cohesion. If you lose contact with casual acquaintances you may fragment your social circle, but if you stop talking to your brother there might be less visible impact on the structure of your social network.

The standard methods of science proceed from observations to hypotheses to testing these hypotheses in controlled experiments. However, it would be a mistake to suppose that every hypothesis that comes out of observation lends itself to rigorous scientific scrutiny. There are, in fact, many questions that can be asked of science that science is not in a position, for one reason or another, to answer. (Such unanswerable questions cannot strictly be termed hypotheses, since a hypothesis must be testable.)

The recent debate over melanoma (skin cancer) screening provides an interesting example of this area of ‘science that is not scientific’ or ‘trans-science’ as a few eminent thinkers have termed it. Let’s start with the observations. There has been an increase in the number of early-stage melanoma cases over the last twenty years. The incidence, measured in cases per thousand people, in the United States has doubled since 1896. As a result of the reported numbers, some physicians recommend screening for melanoma. The ‘hypothesis’ that is implied here is that screening for melanoma will decrease the death rate from the disease. But how do we test it?

The conventional way to evaluate the effectiveness of a medical technique is the double blind trial. In this case we would have to assign some people to receive screening and some control people would not be screened. Then we would look at the death rate for melanoma in the two groups. The problems are logistic and ethical. If the answers are to reach statistical significance we need very large numbers and we need to follow people over whole lifetimes, neither of which is practical. And how do we decide who is to receive what might be a life-saving screening and who will be denied its potential benefits?

The data collected thus far on the effectiveness of screening is, not surprisingly, equivocal.

French cuisine is highly regarded all over the world. Yet in Paris there are more American restaurants selling burgers and fries (which many people now class as ‘junk food’) than there are in any other European capital city. Obviously the French are very fond of ‘junk food’, and are not too proud to eat it.

It is not unusual to see the ball fall into a black slot on a roulette wheel four times in a row. But for it to fall five or six times in a row into the same color is very unusual. Therefore you can win money by waiting for a run of five of the same color and then betting against that color.

 Answer Sheet of Set 7
Select Question:
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  
 Check Answer:
1. The passage offers support for which of the following positions?

Exercise‘Weak’ links are more important than ‘strong’ links

ExerciseLinks between family members would be likely to be disrupted by terminating ‘weak’ links

ExerciseSome people believe that phone-network patterns could be useful to social scientists

ExerciseInformation transmission through phone networks is essentially the same as information transmission through face-to-face contact

ExerciseThe ‘strong’ links are between geographically close individuals

2. In the last sentence the author apparently intends to

Exercisemake the ideas more specific to enhance the reader’s understanding

Exercisereinforce the researchers’ conclusions

Exerciseprovide a practical illustration of the meaning of a strong link

Exercisegeneralize the argument to make it more appealing

Exerciseconcretize an argument about the usefulness of the current research

3. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(Select ALL answer choices that apply)

ExerciseThe researchers had not anticipated the specific effects of removing weak links

ExerciseThe phone-network studied had the same number of users throughout the study

ExerciseThe phone users were unaware of the study

4. The author would apparently agree with which of the following?
(Select ALL answer choices that apply)

ExerciseThe effectiveness of screening for melanoma is not proven

ExerciseDouble blind trials are the best method to evaluate

ExerciseThe death rate from melanoma is rising rapidly

5. The word in bold-face in paragraph 2 is placed in inverted commas to

ExerciseSuggest that the contention in the same sentence cannot be tested scientifically

ExerciseEmphasize the importance of framing hypotheses correctly

ExerciseDraw attention to the main word in the sentence

ExerciseIndicate that the author is using someone else’s view

ExerciseAdd weight to the author’s view of the correct way to evaluate melanoma screening

6. Which of the following does the author mention as an example / examples of the ‘reasons’ mentioned in the highlighted sentence?

ExerciseInsufficiency of sample size

ExerciseEthical considerations

ExerciseAmbiguous data

7. Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the author’s contention?

ExerciseThere are also a larger number of Lebanese restaurants in Paris than there are in other European capital cities

ExerciseFrench Cordon Bleu cuisine is very expensive

ExerciseThe number of French tourists eating in New York burger restaurants is very low

ExerciseJunk food is actually has high nutritional value when eaten in moderation

ExerciseThere are an unusually large number of American tourists in Paris who eat at burger joints

8. If the roulette wheel in question is a fair wheel, which of the following observations or facts, if it were true, would best reveal a fallacy in the logic?

ExerciseIf there were a reliable way to win at roulette it would be well-known by now.

ExerciseIt is hard for a player to keep track of what went before for the time required.

ExerciseThe probability of getting a particular color decreases with the number of times the color has appeared.

ExerciseThe probability of getting a particular color is always the same no matter what has gone before.

ExerciseA person who makes money this way once or twice, will carry on to lose that money after a few more times.