Question: The government should protect culture. Therefore, some people believe that new buildings should be built in traditional styles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Paraphrase the topic: protecting culture vs modern building styles.
State your position clearly (e.g., partly agree).
Mention the balance between cultural preservation and modern needs.
2 Body Paragraph 1 (Agree — traditional styles)
Traditional buildings reflect history, identity, and national pride.
They attract tourism and preserve heritage.
Some traditional designs suit the local climate/materials.
Example: historic city centers maintaining consistent styles.
3 Body Paragraph 2 (Disagree — modern freedom)
Modern architecture improves safety, efficiency, and sustainability.
Cities need flexibility for population growth and new functions.
Strict traditional rules may raise costs or limit creativity.
Example: eco-friendly or high-tech modern buildings.
4 Conclusion:
Restate your opinion briefly.
Suggest a balance: preserve historic areas while allowing modern design elsewhere.
Emphasize the coexistence of heritage protection and development.
Answer 1
It is often argued that governments should preserve cultural heritage, and therefore, some people believe that new buildings should follow traditional architectural styles...
On the one hand, traditional architecture reflects a nation’s history, identity, and values. Buildings designed in historical styles can strengthen cultural continuity and promote tourism...
On the other hand, insisting that all new buildings follow traditional styles may limit innovation and practical development...
In my view, a balanced approach is preferable. Governments should protect culturally significant areas and historic landmarks by encouraging traditional architectural styles in these areas...
In conclusion, although traditional building styles play a crucial role in preserving cultural identity, it is neither necessary nor practical for all new buildings to follow them...