Although countries with long average working hours are economically successful, this often has some negative social consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
You must agree with the statement because it's written in textbooks. If you take the reverse view, you will not only show a lack of common sense but offend political correctness in some readers' minds. It's no help to get a good score.
- Impact employee physical and mental health.
- No time for community and family activities causes low-quality living, later marriage, and fewer children.
- High turnover rates and burnout can reduce efficiency and creativity, which isn't the way to succeed.
- No reason to support long average working hours.
I agree with the statement. The economy is an extra important aspect of society's development, but not the unique target. Long average working hours have several negative social consequences despite some countries' economic success with long working hours.
The first is individual health issues. Extended working ...
Total words: 305
Band: 7The below version has fixed some obvious lexical and grammatical defects. The band is by the revised version, but comments are based on the original version.Task Response:
-The main ideas are extended and supported; the response is ok. 'consume time' is a good point, but you missed it. Coherence and Cohesion:
-Ideas are generally arranged coherently, and there is a clear overall progression.Lexical Resources:
-The lexical resource is sufficient to allow some flexibility and precision, and although there are a few choice errors.Grammar Range and Accuracy:
-Grammar and punctuation are well controlled.