Join the discussion below. You may agree or disagree with a student, offer a different perspective, or build on their ideas.
In your response, you should:
- Express and support your opinion.
- Contribute to the discussion in your own words.
An effective response will contain at least 100 words.
Professor: Tomorrow, we'll discuss the role of standardized tests in college admissions. Some argue that requiring test scores makes it easier to select students from high schools that are very different. Others say standardized tests reinforce inequality and don't capture a student's full potential. What's your take? Should colleges require test scores, or should they abandon this practice?
Riley: I think colleges shouldn't ask students to submit test scores. Standardized tests often measure access to prep resources more than ability, and the high-stakes pressure of these tests can drown out real learning. Grades, portfolios, writing samples, and recommendations are better ways to judge students, as they show persistence and growth over time. Making scores optional widens the door for first-gen and low-income students who might be strong in class but lack the funds or time for test prep.
Marcus: I disagree with Riley. Test scores give admissions officers a common yardstick in a world where transcripts vary widely across schools because grading standards differ. Tests aren't perfect, but they can help flag students who could outperform expectations. Fee waivers and free practice materials can reduce cost barriers, and colleges can consider scores as part of a bigger picture to avoid giving them too much weight.